African Wedding free essay sample

The wedding ceremony November, 3 2012 it was a Saturday evening at the renaissance Marriott in Austin Texas and on the 2nd floor Lisa and Dahlia was having their wedding ceremony. The ceremony was romantic and pleasant with a great opening and great interior design. The ceremony was held in the smallest event room in the Marriott hotel, the place could only have a max of 2 hundred people. When entering the room you face the dancing area in the center of the room then behind that all the way in the back is like a mini stage set as a proscenium, where fancy gold Indian furniture set is set up for the groom and bride to sit. When looking from the stages view, you see the dance floor in front of you in the center of the room then left and right of the dance floor there’s tables and chairs for the guest. We will write a custom essay sample on African Wedding or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The structure and setting of the room was set up really nice because it is set to show the audience/guest that the main focus is the dance floor located in the center then stage located all the way in the front and that is nothing more to pay attention to. The design of the room had an Indian type of theme but had some artistic African crops set up all over the room to show the mixture of the two cultures. For example the furniture a gold jhula which is an Indian/western Nepal antique and on every corner in the room there was these big Somali baskets that were decorated with colorful flowers. Another culture mix was the costumes of the bride and groom, the bride wore a colorful Somalia wedding dress called a Dira while the groom wore a Indian suit called a Sherwani . then towards the middle of the ceremony they would switch out costumes and the bride would wear a Indian dress call a sari and the groom wore a Somali suit. Switching up the costumes really showed that they are willing to except each other’s culture and background. Another way they shared their culture difference coming together is the performance they had. There was two small bands that each performed separately then in the end played a musical together. The first group was south African drummers that performed by playing the drums while doing tricks with it like doing flips while playing the drum or holding the drum with one foot while playing it. The second group was two Indian performers; one played an instrument while the other sang. Then in the end which was the last performance the Indian group played their last song and the African drummers joined in, combining their performance. This was a great idea to show the audience/guest that the combination of the two cultures can work on anything and do fine. All these mixes were all ways to express the type of people the couple is and how they can come together just fine without changing who they are and where they come from. After all the performance and dancing, it was time to set the ring on each other and cut the cake. Since they were still Americans the wedding kept the American tradition and had a flower girl and ring boy approach the ceremony to start it off. Then after the cake the guest help the bride and groom leave out of the hotel into their â€Å"just married† car. This was a great way to end the ceremony because they ended it by using an American tradition with the ring and cake and car. This states that even though they have different cultures and background that they still share their American culture side.

The Free Will Controversy Essays - Desiderius Erasmus, Free Essays

The Free Will Controversy Essays - Desiderius Erasmus, Free Essays The Free Will Controversy The Free Will Controversy Between the years of 1524 and 1527, Erasmus Desiderius and Martin Luther were tangled up in an interesting controversy (Bainton 187). This controversy surprisingly did not involve the authority of the pope, the nature of the church, indulgences, or any of the other practices that each man equally detested. It involved the philosophical topic regarding the question of free or enslaved will (Faulkner 171). Preserved Smith defines free will as the power to apply ones self to the things that make for salvation (348). This controversy was bound to happen for a number of reasons. First of all, Luther was becoming violent in his words and actions in general. Secondly, Luther made himself a target by his assertion in the Heidelberg Disputation of 1518. Luther's exact words were, Free will, after the fall, even when doing the best it can, commits a mortal sin. These two factors led Erasmus to speak out against Luther in De Libero Artitrio (On Free Will). Luther eventually answered back furiously in De Servo Arbitrio (On Enslaved Will) (Bainton 186-7). This was a superior work which explains to historians why Luther prevails in the end (Zweig 139). Erasmus was one of the most intelligent people of his century. Today however, he remains in the minds of most people as nothing more than another name (Zweig 3). In his time, he was the leader of all scholars in Europe from Germany to Italy and Spain and from England to Hungary as well. He stands above the other humanists and forerunners of the reformation (Schaff 402). His great mission was to bring back the spirit of classical and Christian Antiquity (Smith 33-4). Preserved Smith describes the first part of his life, specifically until 1524, as being progressive and reformatory; the second, until his death in 1536, he says was, conservative and reactionary (402). He is described as being somewhat of a nomad, never staying in the same place for more than eight years (48). Compared to his contemporaries, Erasmus did more than his share in preparing the church for the reformation (Schaff 402). Historians refer to Erasmus as the, illegitimate son of a Dutch priest named Gerard, and Margaret (Schaff 404). He was born in Rotterdam on October 27, in the 1466 or 1467 (Faulkner 30). He received his early education at Utrecht and then at Deventer where he began to impress people with his talents. Within him was a love was a passion for books and at the age of just 12, he knew Horace and Terence by memory (Schaff 404). When his father died, he was taken care of by three guardians. Their goal was to have him become a priest which gave them the power to rob him of his inheritance. They placed him in the house of the Brethren of the Common Life at Hertogenbusch. While there, Erasmus calls their houses as, seminaries of monasticism, and refers to their teachers as a, destruction to good intellect. They did not come close to destroying Erasmus's intellect. A few years later, his guardians convinced him to enter a monastery. He entered the Augustinian monastery against his will where he would spend five extremely unhappy years (Faulkner 323). After this, Erasmus went on to achieve his fame in doing the things he always wanted to do (Schaff 407-9). Despite the fact that Erasmus and Luther had many difference, there were ways in which they were similar. Both of them advocated a return to antiquity and an excitement for the golden age of Christianity and pagan Rome. They both had an interest in revolts against the mediaeval scholasticism. Another similarity lies in their child-hoods. They were both born into an era of individualism. Also, they grew up in cities that had recently developed in the same bourgeois class (Smith 321). Many differences between these two men led to their quarrel. Some of these differences were physical. Luther was the son of a minor. This along with his inborn energies made him the rougher of the two. Luther is quoted as saying, I gorge like a Bohemian and gulp down my liquor like a German (Zweig 132). Luther also spoke in a powerful German voice that was

Term paper_INB 5807 - Foundations of Global Business Article

Term paper_INB 5807 - Foundations of Global Business - Article Example This paper seeks to evaluate institutional environments of Turkey as a developing nation, and those of Germany as a developed country, and critically analyze how these environments impact stability and development of these countries. Political Environment Germany is a federal republican economy with republican form of government where there is division of powers between the federal government and the government of individual subdivisions. Turkey on the other hand has the parliamentary system of democratic governance where the executive derives its democratic legitimacy and is held accountable to the parliament/ legislature and legitimacy regarded on the will of the citizens. These kind of political institutions have the executive arms of the government as ceremonial with much accountability based on the legitimacy of the legislature with which activities of the government are shared with majority in the legislature. ... ls of governments with regular checks on the legitimacy of the executive by other branches of the government which helps to promote accountability and transparency (Weatherly & Otter, 2011). Stability in both countries can be traced on their legal systems and the provisions of representations in that for instance, Germany practices civil law system with many fundamental matters of administrative law being left in the hands of the states with the penal system aimed towards rehabilitation of the criminal and protection of the general public. Stability on the other hand can be traced in Turkey’s universal suffrage form of election and representation and continued efforts by government and international organizations to enhance observance of human rights which promotes development in the long run. Economic Environment Germany has a social market economy; capitalism combined with social policies that favor union bargaining and social insurance, coordinated by highly skilled labor f orce and levels of innovations, and higher capital stock and strict levels of management. Turkey on the other hand has a private and a more market based economic system where investment, production and distribution decision are broadly defined by market forces of demand and supply; with prices determined by these market forces. Unlike in social market economy where Rhine capitalism; where finance is more dominated by banks instead of stock exchanges, market model primarily depend on the willingness of the parties to transact. The social and economic/ financial institutions in a Rhine model enhance a well-adjusted balance of power between shareholders and managers, partnerships between employers and unions, regulated markets and shred relationships between banks and companies, and shared values